How do you calculate vdp

So what about the claims this rule of thumb is based on to-1? My conclusion: It is trigonometry. Trigonometry — Rule of thumb is based on the relationship to a right angle and the derived trigonometric functions.

Not every instrument approach is designed with stability in mind, in fact, some cannot be flown safely as depicted. See Approach Impossible for more about this. Here is an example. Another problem for computing a good time to descend — a VDP — is for a circling approach. It can be done, but it isn't clear cut. The airport is extremely difficult to find and especially so at night as you are not lined up with a runway and you are also not looking directly at the airport.

I am flying a Challenger , which is Category D for Circling. I am concerned about pilots wanting to make it work from the VOR-B and being even more encouraged to do so with the circling limitations. This combined with a shortened runway makes me feel like too fast, too steep, diving approach, with long landing on a now shortened runway will result in an over run accident soon.

You are right to be concerned, this looks like a bad situation at night or when the visibility goes down. First of all, as depicted, the approach cannot be flown on centerline with any hopes of being stable. When faced with such an approach, I like to draw out the "planned" descent rates. The person who drew the approach planned it just to get it done within the letter of any law that can be found in TERPS. Here is an example where "just because it is legal doesn't make it safe. The only thing on this drawing you cannot get from the approach plate is the distance from the VOR to the touchdown zone TDZ.

I plotted that using GoogleEarth and got 0. As you can see from my drawing, You are much higher than a stable approach. This is what I call a "Flounder Approach. As far as a decision-to-land point goes, that depends on the aircraft and your personal minimums more than something I can calculate.

Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.

Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. How to calculate the vertical profile for a LOC only approach? Ask Question. Asked 7 years, 10 months ago. Active 5 months ago. Viewed 33k times. Improve this question. Force Force 1, 2 2 gold badges 15 15 silver badges 25 25 bronze badges. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Descend to minimums ft. Fly to 2. Improve this answer. The VOR system is commonly used to support and guide non-precision approaches.

In either the CDFA or the dive and drive method, the visual descent point VDP is located on the glidepath and plays a key role in guiding the landing process. Making a non-precision approach can be dangerous. The FAA and NTSB have identified unstabilized approaches to be one of the key contributing factors to non-precision approach accidents.

By beginning your final descent from the minimum descent altitude MDA as you reach the visual descent point and acquire visual reference, you will normally put yourself on a 3-degree glide path to the touchdown point.

This is the same glideslope used by most precision approaches. Using the visual descent point to begin your final descent helps you to avoid a too steep or too shallow final descent angle. Pilots can also calculate it manually. If you need to manually determine the location of the VDP for your approach, use the below equation which will give you the distance from the touchdown point to the visual descent point in nautical miles nm.

The height above touchdown or HAT, should be indicated on your chart and can be calculated using:. Once you know the distance from the visual descent point to the touchdown zone, you can subtract the distance from the runway threshold to the touchdown zone. If your DME is inoperable, it is recommended to fly the approach as though a VDP was not provided since you have no equipment to locate it.

A visual glide slope indicator VGSI can also be used as a visual aid for pilots flying a non-precision instrument approach. It is important to realize that in many cases, if the VDP is not published, it is because there are terrain or other obstacles that could interfere with a safe descent. In this case, calculate your visual descent point location, but be absolutely certain that you have enough visibility to see any potential hazards before you begin your descent from MDA.

Remember that to be cleared to descend below the minimum descent altitude, the following three criteria must be met:. If all the above criteria are met, you can begin your descent upon arriving at the visual descent point. If not, you must not drop below the MDA until the criteria are met.

If the criteria are not met by the time your reach the visual descent point, this is referred to as missing or flying past the VDP. If you miss the visual descent point, you can technically continue flying at the minimum descent altitude MDA until you reach the missed approach point MAP.

If you are still lack the visibility, are out of position, or are unable to pick up at least one of the visual reference points and begin your final descent by the time you reach the MAP, then you must execute a missed approach procedure and do a go around. First, it is illegal, and second, your angle will be too steep, or your touchdown point will be shifted too far down the runway for safety. For added margin, some pilots like to use the visual descent point as a missed approach point.